Advanced Search
Users Online: 834
About
About Journal
Editorial Board
Articles
Ahead of Print
Current Issue
Archives
Authors
Submit Article
Instruction to Authors
Search
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Image Search
Medline Search
Contact Us
Login
Sign Up
Subscriber Login
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Table of Contents
January-February 2019
Volume 30 | Issue 1
Page Nos. 1-44
Online since Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Accessed 82,699 times.
PDF access policy
Journal allows immediate open access to content in HTML + PDF
View issue as eBook
Issue citations
Issue statistics
RSS
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
EDITORIAL
Better care of urological diseases
p. 1
Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_143_18
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
REVIEW ARTICLES
Programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1 blockade for advanced urothelial carcinoma
p. 2
Jhe-Cyuan Guo, Yu-Chieh Tsai, Yeong-Shiau Pu
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_105_18
Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the paradigm of anticancer therapy in many cancer types, including advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Two anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and three anti-PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have demonstrated their efficacy in the treatment of advanced UC. The response rate of the above ICIs in unselected patients with advanced UC is about 20%. Several on-going large-scale phase III studies explore whether different combinations with ICIs improve the efficacy. To date, there have been several phase I, II, and III studies that examined the efficacy of single-agent PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 blockade in platinum-failed advanced UC patients, and two phase II studies demonstrated the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as the first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible advanced UC patients. Here, we review and compare the efficacy and adverse events of the five ICIs in advanced UC.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Stroke and lower urinary tract symptoms: A neurosurgical view
p. 8
Yu-Cheng Chou, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Tomor Harnod, Hsu-Tung Lee, Hann-Chorng Kuo
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_82_18
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) are common neurological sequelae of stroke, which negatively impact the mortality of patients with stroke and the quality of life of both patients and their caregivers. There are three hierarchical micturition centers: the sacral spinal center, subconscious structures, and conscious structures. Several brain imaging modalities for micturition studies on humans and animals and neuroanatomical studies on animals have facilitated a better understanding of LUTSs. The urodynamic findings in patients with stroke may vary and tend to evolve with time; the identification of the underlying cause of poststroke voiding dysfunction helps optimize the management of these patients. For patients with stroke with overactive bladders, the first-line treatments include behavioral therapies and the second-line therapies include the use of drugs. Intermittent or indwelling catheterization can be used for patients with stroke with detrusor underactivity. In this article, we discuss the current consensus, relevant assessment modalities, and management of LUTSs in patients with stroke.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (2) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: CLINIC SCIENCE
Effect of tadalafil on erectile function in patients after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with unilateral or bilateral nerve sparing
p. 14
I-Yen Lee, Min-Che Tung, Chao-Yu Hsu, Jue-Hawn Yin, Yu-Kang Chang, Wei-Chun Weng, Li-Hua Huang, Zhon-Min Huang, Cheng-Kuang Yang, Yen-Chuan Ou
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_74_18
Objective:
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major complication of radical prostatectomy. Despite advances in surgical techniques, the postoperative continence and potency rates are still not satisfactory. Many studies have reported experiences with penile rehabilitation using tadalafil for patients receiving nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, but similar reports are still lacking in Taiwan.
Patients and Methods:
We collected 163 patients that had undergone unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy from January 2013 to December 2014 in Tungs' Hospital. One month after operation, 5 mg tadalafil once daily was prescribed for 54 patients whose Foley's catheter had been removed and who had ED. We recorded the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score at the 12
th
month after surgery. We defined postsurgery IIEF-5 ≥22 as potency or no ED. We compared the differences in clinical parameters and postsurgery potency rates between patients with or without tadalafil treatment.
Results:
The postsurgery potency rates of those with tadalafil treatment were significantly higher than that of those without tadalafil treatment (55.6% vs. 32.1%) after a 1-year follow-up observation. The mean (standard deviation) of IIEF-5
pre
among those with and without tadalafil treatment was 21.3 (4.5) and 19.2 (4.2), respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical condition parameters between patients with potency with or without tadalafil treatment. The results indicated that the tadalafil-treated patients had a higher odds ratio (OR) of potency (adjusted OR = 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28–5.22) than the nontadalafil-treated patients. However, those ≥65 years old were associated with a lower potency rate (adjusted OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.99).
Conclusion:
Starting penile rehabilitation with tadalafil 5 mg daily 1 month after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is safe for patients. Patients with mild-to-moderate ED should use tadalafil 5 mg daily after receiving nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy due to its significant benefit in erectile function recovery.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Pressure compression of the access tract for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
p. 19
Shun-Kai Chang, Ian-Seng Cheong, Ming-Chin Cheng, Yeong-Chin Jou, Chia-Chun Chen, Min-Min Hu
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_94_18
Objective:
To obtain adequate hemostasis, we compressed the access tract at the end of operation for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The clinical results of 216 consecutive patients were evaluated by retrospective chart review.
Materials and Methods:
After stone extraction, an 8F Foley catheter was inserted into the renal pelvis and was then inflated and gently retracted. The working sheath was withdrawn to the renal capsule, the renal access tract was packed with oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel
TM
) strips, and the tract was compressed with smaller dilators through the working sheath for 5 min.
Results:
Of the 216 patients, 139 were male and 77 were female. The mean age was 56.0 ± 11.7 years. The stone characteristics were renal stones in 146 patients, ureteral stones in 47 patients, and kidney with ureteral stones in 23 patients. The average stone size was 3.6 ± 2.1 cm, and the average operation time was 80.5 ± 30.1 min. The target stones were all removed in each patient and the overall postoperative stone-free rate was 73.6%. The postoperative blood transfusion rate was 1.4% (three patients). Postoperative fever was noted in 23 patients (10.6%) and sepsis was noted in three patients (1.4%). The average postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 ± 1.4 days.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that pressure compression may be an alternative method to minimize hemorrhagic complications during tubeless PCNL.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (1) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Second repair of pediatric inguinal hernia: A longitudinal cohort study
p. 24
Yi-Sheng Chen, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Judy Yi-Chu Chen, Shang-Jen Chang, Ke-Chi Chen
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_26_18
Background:
The objective of this nationwide observational study was to report the rate and risk factors for the second repair after pediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Materials and Methods:
Children born from 1998 to 2005 were chosen from a cohort of 1,000,000 cases, which were randomly selected from an insured population of 23 million people in Taiwan (Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005). We identified all hernia repairs in the period of 1998–2012 for the sample population and then used a Cox proportional hazards regression model to analyze the risk factors for the second repair after pediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Results:
The total sample population comprised 79,820 children, with a male-to-female ratio of 4.27:1. During a mean observation period of 11.4 ± 2.2 years, 3339 (4.18%) of the children in the sample population received primary inguinal hernia repair. Of the 251 children (7.52%) who underwent a second repair, 220 were boys (8.13%) and 31 were girls (4.9%); 244 (8.62%) underwent primary unilateral hernia repair, and 7 (1.38%) underwent primary bilateral hernia repair. Considering that bilateral hernia involves unilateral hernia on two sides, the expected recurrence rate after primary unilateral hernia repair was calculated as 0.69%. The calculated rates for late occurrence of contralateral hernia after primary unilateral hernia repair were 11.04%, 7.73%, and 3.28% for children aged 0–1, 1–4, and >4 years, respectively. Significant risk factors for second hernia repair were age at first primary hernia repair and unilateral hernia (
P
< 0.001). Gender and prematurity were not risk factors for second hernia repair.
Conclusions:
The second repair rate after primary unilateral or bilateral hernia repair was 7.52%. The only risk factor that predicted the second repair was age of <4 years at the time of operation. The expected recurrence rate after any hernia was estimated as 0.69%.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (1) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Pheochromocytoma: A single-center 20-year experience
p. 30
Lung-Feng Cheng, Shih-Che Tseng, Chia-Cheng Yu, Jen-Tai Lin, Jeng-Yu Tsai, I-Hsuan Chen, Yin-Shen Chen
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_76_18
Objective:
Pheochromocytomas are catecholamine-producing neuroendocrine tumors arising from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla or extra-adrenal paraganglia. There is no large-scale study in Taiwan at present. Our retrospective analysis was focused on clinical characteristics of Taiwanese patients with pheochromocytoma.
Method:
We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients who were pathologically proved as pheochromocytoma at the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital between Jan. 1990 and Jan. 2014. Parameters including patient and tumor characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment and long-term followup results were collected from the medical records. Metastasis was confirmed by pathologic proof using surgical removal or percutaneous biopsy.
Result:
Thirty-one patients (64.5%) had adrenal and 17 (35.4%) had extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. The locations of extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma included the retroperitoneum in 6 patients (35%), head and neck in 4 (23%), scrotum in 2 (12%), urinary bladder in 2 patients (12%), multiple organs in 2 (12%), and mediastinum in 1 (6%). The most common symptom was sustained hypertension (52%). Five patients were diagnosed as malignant pheochromocytoma due to pathologically proved metastasis.
Conclusion:
Pheochromocytomas are rare neuro-endocrine tumors with a highly variable clinical presentation. Prompt surgical removal of pheochromocytoma ensures a better prognosis. Radical surgical removal of tumor with vigorous control of blood pressure is the mainstay to improve symptoms and survival for malignant pheochromocytoma. Multi-center and large-scale studies were warranted and Lifelong followup is strongly recommended for all patients with pheochromocytoma.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (1) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
p. 36
Vilas Sabale, Prasun Pramanik, Deepakkumar Mane, Vikram Satav, Avreen Singh Shah, Niraj Chaudari, Ashwani Kandari
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_107_18
Objective:
This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Miniperc (MIP) XS (7.5 Fr) nephroscope in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm.
Methods:
This was a prospective study that enrolled 65 patients with limited stone burden in calyx or pelvis, which were treated with MIP XS. Primary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFRs), operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, requirement of analgesic postsurgery, decline in hematocrit, stent requirement, and complications and requirement of ancillary procedure.
Results:
The mean stone size was 17.46 ± 2.9 mm. The patients were treated with MIP XS and had a mean operative time of 38.63 ± 8.4 min, 1.74% drop in hematocrit levels postsurgery and 96.9% SFRs. The length of hospital stay was 55.48 ± 4.6 h. Postoperative fever and nephrostomy leakage occurred in 9 and 1 patients, respectively. Six cases required some drainage procedure (double-J stent/nephrostomy). No patient required blood transfusion.
Conclusion:
This study showed that MIP XS could be considered as an effective treatment option in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm as it scores in all the standard parameters used to measure percutaneous nephrolithotripsy outcomes.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Untreated urinary bladder stone and subsequent squamous cell carcinoma
p. 40
Jen-Shu Tseng, Marcelo Chen, Wen-Chou Lin
DOI
:10.4103/UROS.UROS_16_17
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
CME TEST
CME Test
p. 42
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
REVIEWER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Reviewer Acknowledgement
p. 44
The Editorial Board of Urological Science thanks the following reviewers for their invaluable contribution in 2018. Their support is very much appreciated. Hong-Chiang Chang Shang-Jen Chang Wayne Yen-Hwa Chang Ying-Hsu Chang Yu-Lung Chang Chien-Lun Chen Chung-Hsin Chen Hsiao-Wen Chen Kuan-Chou Chen Kuo-Liang Chen Po-Cheng Chen Shin-Hong Chen Shiou-Sheng Chen Wen-Chi Chen Yen-Ta Chen Yu-Chi Chen Hong-Lin Cheng Wei-Ming Cheng Yu-Sheng Cheng Bing-Juin Chiang Heng-Chieh Chiang Ni Chiang Po-Hui Chiang Yang-Jen Chiang Yi-Chun Chiu Eric Chieh-Lung Chou Yii-Her Chou Po-Ming Chow Cheng-Keng Chuang Jeff Shih-Chieh Chueh Hsiao-Jen Chung Hui-Ming Chung Shiu-Dong Chung Chen-Hsun Ho Dong-Ru Ho Chen-Pang Hou Cheng-Hsing Hsieh Hui-lung Hsieh Hueih-Shing Hsu Yu-Chao Hsu Chao-Yuan Huang Eric Yi-Hsiu Huang Ho-Shiang Huang Kuo-How Huang Shih-Tsung Huang Shu-Pin Huang Tsnug-Yi Huang Wen-Hong Huang William J. Huang Yun-Ching Huang Shih-Ya Hung Thomas I-Sheng Hwang Mei-Yu Jang Bang-Ping Jiann Yeong-Chin Jou Yung-Shun Juan Chien-Chang Kao Ming-Chung Ko Yuh-Chen Kuo Marie Carmela Lapitan Jane-Dar Lee Ming-Huei Lee Wei-Chia Lee Ching-Chia Li Wei-Ming Li Jing-Yao Liang Chun-Hou Liao Cheng-Chia Lin Chih-Chieh Lin Je-Sun Lin Shuei-Liong Lin Tsung-Yen Lin Tzu-Ping Lin Wei-Yu Lin Yi-Chia Lin Yung-Ming Lin Chia-Chu Liu Shih-Ping Liu Shing-Hwa Lu Yu-Chuan Lu En Meng Yen-Chuan Ou See-Tong Pang Chung-Hsin Peng Angeles Sanchis-Bonet Hung Shao Cheng-Huang Shen Hao-ping Tai Huai-Ching Tai Yat-Ching Tong Chia-Chun Tsai Jeng-Yu Tsai Yao-Chou Tsai Yuh-Shyan Tsai Chih-Wei Tsao Chung-Cheng Wang Jhih-Cheng Wang Pai-Fu Wang Shian-Shiang Wang Shuo-Meng Wang Ta-Min Wang Wei-Chun Weng Chia-Chang Wu Sheng-Tang Wu Wei-Che Wu Cheng-Kuang Yang Chi-Rei Yang Ming-Hsin Yang Stephen Shei-Dei Yang Teng-Kai Yang Hsin-Chih Yeh Jue-Hawn Yin Chia-Cheng Yu Dah-Shyong Yu
[ABSTRACT]
HTML Full Text not available
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Next Issue
Previous Issue
SUBMIT ARTICLE
POPULAR ARTICLES
JOIN AS REVIEWER
GET EMAIL ALERTS
RECOMMEND
© Urological Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Sitemap
|
What's New
|
Feedback
|
Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
Online since 8
th
February 2018.