• Users Online: 114
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 205-212

The effect of intraurethrally applied anatolian propolis extract on urethral healing in a rat model


1 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey
2 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey
3 Department of Urology, Samsun Vezirköprü State Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
4 Department of Pathology, Dr. Ridvan Ege Hospital, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey

Date of Submission15-Nov-2021
Date of Decision08-Aug-2022
Date of Acceptance30-Aug-2022
Date of Web Publication30-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Reha Girgin
Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/UROS.UROS_158_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: Urethral stricture may cause irreversible results, as it prevents normal voiding. Although various endoscopic and open surgical options are available, the results are not always satisfactory so the main purpose is to prevent the formation of urethral scar. Our purpose was to examine the effects of intraurethrally administered Anatolian propolis on healing after an experimental urethral injury. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 Wistar male rats were used. Rats were divided into five equal groups: healthy control (Group 1), urethral damage/pathology (Group 2), solvent control (Group 3), 1-week propolis treatment (Group 4) and 3-week propolis treatment (Group 5). Urethral damage was performed with a 29G needle. Intraurethral, 50% ethanol, was administered in the solvent control group and 30% propolis was administered intraurethrally to the rats in Groups 3 and 4. Penile tissues were taken under deep anesthesia and examined under a light microscope. Results: Irregularities and luminal narrowing in the urethral epithelium and connective tissue were found in Group 2, except for one rat. Similarly, hyperemia-bleeding was observed in all rats except for one rat. Irregularities and hyperemia in the urethral epithelium and connective tissue were found in Group 3, except for two rats. Total improvement was observed in one rat, and more than 50% of fibrosis was observed in four rats in Groups 2 and 3. In Group 4, irregularity was observed in the urethral epithelium in four rats, while no inflammation was found in five rats. All of the rats had <50% fibrosis. In Group 5, six rats had complete recovery and <30% fibrosis. Conclusion: Anatolian propolis applied into the urethra seems to accelerate recovery after urethral trauma and reduces the formation of fibrosis.

Keywords: Anatolian propolis, intraurethral, urethral healing, urethral stricture


How to cite this article:
Girgin R, Can EY, Çeker G, Kaymaz E, Çinar &, Mungan NA. The effect of intraurethrally applied anatolian propolis extract on urethral healing in a rat model. Urol Sci 2022;33:205-12

How to cite this URL:
Girgin R, Can EY, Çeker G, Kaymaz E, Çinar &, Mungan NA. The effect of intraurethrally applied anatolian propolis extract on urethral healing in a rat model. Urol Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 6];33:205-12. Available from: https://www.e-urol-sci.com/text.asp?2022/33/4/205/362478




  Introduction Top


Urethral stricture is described as the narrowing of the urethra as a result of scar tissue formation due to the increased fibroblastic activity of the spongy corpus spongiosum.[1] It may cause irreversible results as it prevents normal voiding.[2] Although various endoscopic and open surgical options are recommended as a treatment approach, the results are not always satisfactory.[3] Because the main purpose is to prevent the formation of urethral scar tissue, many oral and intraurethral agents have been investigated in this context.[4],[5]

Wounds following tissue injuries heal, and the healing process begins with an inflammatory response and ends with scar formation.[1] During this complex process, the main role is played by the fibroblast through the effect of various cytokines and growth factors.[1] This results in the accumulation of large amounts of matrix components, such as collagen and glycosaminoglycan, in the wound site.[6],[7]

Excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation determines the prognosis of the urethral healing process, and it is aimed to be corrected in the treatment. Although ECM proteins are among the main components of normal tissues, there are significant changes in the levels and types within the scar tissue.[6]

Propolis, a bee product, has many biological activities.[8] Therefore, it has an area of application in medical science in the treatment of various skin, rheumatic, heart diseases, and cancer.[8] In light of this information, we aimed to evaluate the histopathological effects, including fibrotic changes of intraurethrally administered propolis, on urethral wound healing in rats.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was conducted in the laboratory of Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (protocol number: 2019-07-04/04) after obtaining approval from the local ethics committee. A total of 40 Wistar albino male rats (200–252 g) were anesthetized by intraperitoneally administering a combination of 90 mg/kg ketamine (Ketalar-Eczacibaşi, Turkey) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun-Bayer, Turkey). Experiments were conducted in five groups [Table 1]: healthy control (Group 1), urethral damage/pathology (Group 2), 3-week solvent control (Group 3), and 1-week (Group 4) and 3-week (Group 5) urethral propolis treatment groups.
Table 1: Rat groups and their characteristics

Click here to view


Urethral injury was induced as previously described by Ayyildiz et al.[1] The damage was created by scratching the ventral surface of the urethral epithelium after the insertion of a 29-g syringe tip approximately 5 mm from the external meatus after giving it a hook shape. Experimental urethral damage was induced in all rats other than the healthy control group. Following urethral injury, 50 μL of 50% ethanol was administered to the rats in Group 3 by inserting a plastic-tipped angiocath into the urethra for 3 weeks daily. Group 4 was administered 20 mg (50 μL) of Anatolian propolis once a day for 1 week and Group 5 was administered 20 mg (50 μL) once a day for 3 weeks by inserting a plastic-tipped angiocath into the urethra. The biochemical content of the propolis we used is presented in [Table 2].
Table 2: Features of intraurethrally administered propolis in study groups

Click here to view


In this study, a commercially produced BEEO UP 30% propolis solution (SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler San ve Tic. A.Ş. -SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler R&D Centre [Bee'o /Bee&You R&D Centre]/Turkey) was used. Anatolian propolis was collected from beehives in different regions in Turkey and confirmed by an agricultural organization. In general, after the collection, propolis is mixed with beeswax and must be extracted to make it ready for use. Although many extraction methods can be used for propolis, the most preferred one is by dissolving it with ethyl alcohol. In the experiment, the main components of propolis were cut into small pieces, mixed with 250 mL of 70% ethanol (25 g), and incubated at room temperature for 48 h with shaking (150 rpm).

The extract obtained was purified with Whatman filter paper, and the ethanol content was evaporated using a rotary vacuum evaporator to obtain a purified propolis extract. Then, the purified extract was diluted using 50% ethanol to obtain a 30% propolis solution. The extracts were stored at 2°C–8°C under protective-light conditions and warmed to room temperature just before injection.

Because no substance was given to the rats in Groups 1 and 2, they provided the baseline histopathological data. The rats were kept in their special cages in rooms with a constant room temperature (22°C–24°C), humidity (50%–55%), and light/dark cycle (12-h light/12-h dark). Water and feed were regularly changed. A cage base consisting of sterilized dust-free wood shavings changed three times a week was used. The rats were sacrificed at the end of the 3rd week by administering high-dose anesthesia. All rats were penectomized from the proximal injured area, and the tissues were placed in 10% formaldehyde solution separately.

Histopathological evaluation

After fixation at the appropriate time, each group was coded separately and taken for macroscopic examination and sampling. Penectomy materials were examined by slicing in the transverse axis. Two circular samples were obtained from the meatus and middle part, with urticaria passing through it. The samples were coded and blocked separately and followed routinely. After the paraffin-embedding procedures, two sections, each 4-μm thick, were taken from each sample. One of these sections was stained with hematoxylin-eosin dye for routine examination. The other section was stained with Masson's trichrome histochemical stain to evaluate fibrosis. Staining with Masson's trichrome was performed automatically using a Ventana Roche BenchMark Special Stain histochemistry device. The materials were examined using a light microscope.

The presence of hyperemia–hemorrhage in the corpus spongiosum, as well as inflammation, was evaluated in the hematoxylin–eosin-stained sections. Furthermore, urethral narrowing and the presence of papillary structures in the epithelium were evaluated. Finally, it was evaluated whether full recovery could be achieved. Hyperemia–hemorrhage and urethral narrowing in the corpus spongiosum and evaluation of papillary structures in the epithelium were performed in the form of present or absent.

We considered the inflammatory cells localized to the lamina propria under the epithelium for the evaluation of inflammation.[9] Primarily, we classified the inflammatory cells as acute or chronic according to the predominance of neutrophils or lymphoplasmocytic cells, respectively.[9] Subsequently, we graded the inflammatory cells according to their density as mild, moderate, and severe. In this evaluation, we counted the number of cells per mm2. Accordingly, we considered the presence of 5–25 lymphocytic cells per mm2 only in the lamina propria as mild. If inflammatory cells infiltrate the epithelium, we classified it as moderate or severe. The presence of 26-100 lymphocytic cells per mm2 was assumed as moderate and more than 100 lymphocytic cells per mm2 as severe.

For the histochemical evaluation, four large magnification areas (×40) were randomly scanned in the penile corpus spongiosum area in each section stained with Masson's trichrome, and the ratio of fibrosis and collagen tissue to muscle tissue was calculated. The blue and red areas represent the collagen and Masson's trichrome-stained muscle tissue, respectively. Quantitative analysis of the collagen areas was conducted using the ImageJ software, an open-source freeware (U.S. National Institutes of Health, USA; website: http://rsb.info. nih.gov/ij/download.html). Accordingly, fibrosis was graded in four groups according to the density of the amount of collagen.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using R-4.0.2. The descriptive statistics of the qualitative variables are expressed in frequency and percentage. Fisher–Freeman–Halton and Fisher's exact Chi-squared tests were employed for the intergroup comparisons of the variables. In all statistical comparisons in the study, results with a P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Inflammatory changes were in the form of chronic inflammation in all groups. When the groups were compared in terms of inflammation, the group with the least inflammatory changes was the first group of healthy rats. In this group, only mild inflammation was observed, which occurred in only one rat. In Group 2, intense inflammation was detected as expected (severe in three rats, moderate in three rats). Although the inflammation observed in Group 3 was not as severe as the pathology group, it was generally characterized by moderate inflammation (moderate to mild in seven rats). Groups 4 and 5 were similar in terms of inflammation findings, i.e., a significant reduction in inflammation (no inflammation in five and six rats, respectively). The intensity of inflammation in Group 2 was statistically different from those in Groups 4 and 5. The inflammation findings in all groups are presented in [Figure 1]a, [Figure 1]b, [Figure 1]c, [Figure 1]d, [Figure 1]e.
Figure 1: Evaluation of inflammation in subepithelial tissue and corpus cavernosum, (a) No inflammation was observed in the healthy group marked with an arrow (H and E, × 400), (b) In this image, periurethral, subepithelial area has severe inflammation. Note that the inflammatory cells are more than 100 in one HPF and also some of them attack the epithelium (H and E, × 400). These inflammatory cells have been demonstrated with an arrow. This image belongs to the pathology group, (c) Note that there are inflammatory cells in the subepithelial region. This inflammation is not severe as figüre 1b and also not weak as in image 1d. This image is an example of moderate inflammation (H and E, × 400), (d and e) These are similar images in terms of the density of inflammatory cells. Note the sparse and scattered cells that are marked with an arrow. The count of them is < 5 for one HPF. This density of inflammation belonged to Groups 4 and 5 and has been graded as “low” (H and E, × 400). HPE: High power field

Click here to view


In our study, the most important indicator of urethral epithelial damage was the narrowing of the urethral lumen and the presence of papillary structures. Spongiotic damage was compared between the groups in terms of the presence of hyperemia. From this viewpoint, none of these findings was detected in the rats in Group 1, whereas in the majority of the rats in Groups 2 and 3, these findings indicating damage were observed. Narrow urethral lumen, papillary structures, and hyperemia were significantly reduced in Group 5. These findings were found to be statistically significant between Groups 2 and 5. Although a difference between Groups 2 and 4 was observed, these findings were not statistically significant. [Figure 2]a, [Figure 2]b, [Figure 2]c, [Figure 2]d, [Figure 2]e presents the prominent histomorphological findings in each group. Therefore, total healing, which we evaluated as the disappearance of the aforementioned findings, was statistically significant between Groups 2 and 5.
Figure 2: Evaluation of hyperemia and healing of the urethra, (a) In the healthy control group, the open urethral lumen and corpus cavernosum without hyperemia (H and E, × 200), (b and c) These two images demonstrate the pathology and solvent control group. Both of them are similar in terms of hyperemia and healing of the urethra. Note that the significant bleeding in the subepithelial area in a rat of Group 2 (marked with a blue arrow) and narrowing of the urethral lümen-prominent papillary configurations like fingers in the epithelium in a rat of Group 3 (marked with a black arrow) (H and E, × 200), (d and e) These images belong to Groups 4 and 5. In these images, there is not significant hyperemia. And also, the lumen of the urethelium is open like normal urethelium, as seen in image 2a (H and E, × 200)

Click here to view


A comparison of the groups in terms of fibrosis was performed. Although differences were observed in the comparison, they were not statistically significant. The degrees of fibrosis are presented in [Figure 3]. Fibrosis was detected at <30% in all rats in the healthy control group [Figure 3]a but increased in half of the rats in Groups 2 and 3 (50%–70% or >70%) [Figure 3]b and [Figure 3]c. No significant fibrosis was detected in any of the rats in Groups 4 [Figure 3]d and 5. In Group 5, fibrosis was detected at <30% in six rats, as observed in healthy rats [Figure 3e]. However, this finding did not exhibit statistical significance.
Figure 3: Grading of fibrosis with trichrome stain. For this stain, the blue color represents the collagen. The arrow in each image points to collagen, (a) Note the percentage of blue color in this image is low, nearly 30% (×400), (b) >70% fibrosis (×400) in a case belonging to the study group. In this image, the intense blue color means fibrosis has markedly increased, (c) In this picture, we see the intense blue color again (×400). When the collagen represented by the blue color is compared to the general, it was determined to be on the scale of 50%–70%, (d and e) These images belong to Groups 4 and 5. In these images, note that the collagen is not as dense as in b and c Fibrosis was 30%–50% (×400)

Click here to view


All histopathological findings in the groups are summarized in [Table 3].
Table 3: The comparison of groups according to histopathologic features

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Increased urethral scar tissue resulting in decreased urine flow is the most catastrophic result of urethral injury. At present, surgeries performed by removing the scar tissue and replacing it with native tissue yielded the most satisfactory results.[10] However, because such surgeries are complex, endoscopic surgeries are preferred, the results of which are not satisfactory at all.[10] In this process, in which patients often go into a vicious circle, the main goal should be to prevent the formation of scar tissue.

Urethral healing occurs in four stages, similar to dermal healing, and is completed with the remodeling phase that determines the final appearance of the tissue.[11],[12] The wound healing process can be negatively affected by infection, insufficient oxygenation, tissue nutrition, and oxidative stress factors.[12] Despite the current knowledge on tissue healing, there is no available treatment that can accelerate this process.[12] There are, however, studies on various oral and intraurethral agents to prevent this process. Agents such as intraurethral triamcinolone, hydrocortisone–furacine combination, and honey have been used in clinical studies. In addition, various growth factors, chemotactic agents, and gene carriers have been experimentally studied.[1],[13],[14]

At present, natural products have found increasing interest and use in modern disease management. In this regard, bee products, in particular, have attracted attention owing to their being natural and ancient. Propolis is a resinous product produced by bees in nature and used while constructing their hives by sealing them to protect new generations against pathogenic organisms.[15] In the chemical structure of propolis, around 300 compounds, including various amino acids, vitamins, fats, and carbohydrates, have been identified.[16],[17] However, phenols, including phenolic acid and flavonoids, constitute the main active group.[17] Many studies have reported that propolis has antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiulcer, anticancer, and cardio-, hepato-, and neuroprotective effects.[17],[18] In addition, it has been shown to be effective in wound healing in many studies.[12],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] However, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate the protective effects of propolis against urethral damage.

Fibrosis is defined as an excessive accumulation of fibrous connective tissues (ECM components such as collagen and fibronectin) in and around damaged tissues, which can lead to permanent scarring and loss of function in the affected tissue.[23] The inflammatory process that is known to play a key role in wound healing is also associated with scar formation.[24] Although inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and monocytes are important in the removal of necrotic tissue and bacteria from the area of benefit, the reactive oxygen radicals they release can paradoxically cause damage to the environment.[23] As a result, if inflammatory macrophages and neutrophils are not immediately eliminated, they can worsen the inflammatory response that causes scarring and tissue damage.[25] This is best evidenced by the fetal wound healing without a scar due to the absence of the typical inflammatory response.[26] Hormonal changes that reduce the inflammatory response will also reduce scar formation.[26]

The effects of propolis on wound healing are thought to be caused by its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activities.[19] Propolis inhibits the activity of cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase, thereby reducing the production of prostaglandin E2 and the expression of the inducible isoform of COX-2.[24] Furthermore, it decreases neutrophils and macrophages by downregulating the protein expression of the inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B-cells (pNF-κB) and reducing the production of tumor growth factor-β (TGF-β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6.[23],[24] In terms of its antibacterial effects, previous research suggested that propolis inhibits lipid metabolism, thereby affecting membrane stability and leading to cell lysis.[27],[28] Studies also demonstrated that it inhibits bacterial ribonucleic acid polymerase and interferes with bacterial motility, cell division, and protein synthesis.[27],[28]

In addition, studies have shown that propolis reduces the ECM protein fibronectin responsible for collagen fibrosis.[19],[29] Propolis caused changes in the composition of the ECM and reduced ECM destruction by decreasing TNF-a-induced matrix metalloproteinases and changing the ratio of collagen type 1–3 in favor of type 1.[30],[31],[32],[33] Propolis triggers wound healing by increasing the expression of TGF-β, which plays a key role in wound healing by maintaining balanced excess fibroblastic activity by decreasing cells that secrete TGF-β.[19],[34] Moreover, propolis is thought to facilitate the cell repair process during wound healing by decreasing inflammatory cell activity and reducing free-radical activity.[12],[19]

In our study, we demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effect of propolis, which we applied intraurethrally, in Groups 4 and 5. We found that inflammation decreased more in Group 5 than in Group 4, and thus, its anti-inflammatory activity increased over time. The healing process was 75% complete in Group 5. Furthermore, we saw that the antifibrotic efficacy reached 75% in Group 5.

The effects associated with the topical use of ethanol have been evaluated in the literature, and although it has been emphasized that it may cause local irritation and allergic contact dermatitis, there have been conflicting results.[35] A low-toxicity profile has been reported in the local use of hydroalcoholic propolis, in which ethanol was used as a solvent.[36],[37],[38] In our study, it was observed that alcohol administration in the solvent group did not increase the pathological damage compared with the pathology group. Therefore, it can be deduced that the effect of alcohol as a solvent can be ignored.

Propolis is a product with an extremely rich biological content.[39] Among these biological contents, flavonoids and phenolic compounds are especially responsible for their antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and wound healing properties.[12] Flavonoids have been scientifically shown to reduce lipid peroxidation. At present, any drug that reduces lipid peroxidation is believed to reduce cell damage and increase cell synthesis.[40] Furthermore, flavonoids and terpenoids are responsible for promoting the healing process of injuries owing to their astringent and antimicrobial properties.[40]


  Conclusions Top


Anatolian propolis, which we applied to the urethra, was found to have the ability to reduce inflammation and prevent the development of fibrosis because of urethral damage. At present, the increasing interest in propolis has also increased its application. Unlike other bee products, propolis, with its multiple mechanisms of action, is a natural product that has the potential to prevent urethral scarring and narrowing when administered intraurethrally. However, more studies are needed to describe this issue better.

Acknowledgments

We thank to “SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler San ve Tic. A.Ş” for their effort to provide the Anatolian propolis used in our study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Ayyildiz A, Akgül KT, Cebeci O, Nuhoğlu B, Caydere M, Ustün H, et al. Intraurethral honey application for urethral injury: An experimental study. Int Urol Nephrol 2007;39:815-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sangkum P, Yafi FA, Kim H, Bouljihad M, Ranjan M, Datta A, et al. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (xiaflex) for the treatment of urethral stricture disease in a rat model of urethral fibrosis. Urology 2015;86:6.e1-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shi Z, Wang Q, Jiang D. The preventative effect of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell exosomes on urethral stricture in rats. Transl Androl Urol 2020;9:2071-81.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tian Y, Wazir R, Yue X, Wang KJ, Li H. Prevention of stricture recurrence following urethral endoscopic management: What do we have? J Endourol 2014;28:502-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ayyildiz A, Nuhoglu B, Gülerkaya B, Caydere M, Ustün H, Germiyanoglu C, et al. Effect of intraurethral mitomycin-C on healing and fibrosis in rats with experimentally induced urethral stricture. Int J Urol 2004;11:1122-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Da-Silva EA, Sampaio FJ, Dornas MC, Damiao R, Cardoso LE. Extracellular matrix changes in urethral stricture disease. J Urol 2002;168:805-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ. What is new in wound healing? Turk J Med Sci 2004;34:147-60  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Huang S, Zhang CP, Wang K, Li GQ, Hu FL. Recent advances in the chemical composition of propolis. Molecules 2014;19:19610-32.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Grimes MD, Tesdahl BA, Schubbe M, Dahmoush L, Pearlman AM, Kreder KJ, et al. Histopathology of anterior urethral strictures: Toward a better understanding of stricture pathophysiology. J Urol 2019;202:748-56.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Choi J, Lee CU, Sung HH. Learning curve of various type of male urethroplasty. Investig Clin Urol 2020;61:508-13.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ninan N, Thomas S, Grohens Y. Wound healing in urology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015;82-83:93-105.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Al-Waili N. Mixing two different propolis samples potentiates their antimicrobial activity and wound healing property: A novel approach in wound healing and infection. Vet World 2018;11:1188-95.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ. What is new wound healing? Turk J Med Sci 2004;34:147-60.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Yalcinkaya FR, Davarci M, Gokce A, Güven EO, İnci M, Kerem M, et al. Intraurethral utterbasti application for urethral injury in rats. J Anim Vet Adv 2002;11:1494-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wieczynska A, Wezgowiec J, Wieckiewicz W, Czarny A, Kulbacka J, Nowakowska D, et al. Antimicrobial activity, cytotoxicity and total phenolic content of different extracts of propolis from the west pomeranian region in poland. Acta Pol Pharm 2017;74:715-22.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Silva-Carvalho R, Baltazar F, Almeida-Aguiar C. Propolis: A complex natural product with a plethora of biological activities that can be explored for drug development. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:206439.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kurek-Górecka A, Rzepecka-Stojko A, Górecki M, Stojko J, Sosada M, Swierczek-Zieba G. Structure and antioxidant activity of polyphenols derived from propolis. Molecules 2013;19:78-101.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Garraud O, Hozzein WN, Badr G. Wound healing: Time to look for intelligent, 'natural' immunological approaches? BMC Immunol 2017;18 Suppl 1:23.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Olczyk P, Komosinska-Vassev K, Wisowski G, Mencner L, Stojko J, Kozma EM. Propolis modulates fibronectin expression in the matrix of thermal injury. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:748101.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Jacob A, Parolia A, Pau A, Davamani Amalraj F. The effects of Malaysian propolis and Brazilian red propolis on connective tissue fibroblasts in the wound healing process. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015;15:294.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Berretta AA, Nascimento AP, Bueno PC, Vaz MM, Marchetti JM. Propolis standardized extract (EPP-AF®), an innovative chemically and biologically reproducible pharmaceutical compound for treating wounds. Int J Biol Sci 2012;8:512-21.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Martinotti S, Pellavio G, Laforenza U, Ranzato E. Propolis induces AQP3 expression: A possible way of action in wound healing. Molecules 2019;24:1544.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Corrêa FR, Schanuel FS, Moura-Nunes N, Monte-Alto-Costa A, Daleprane JB. Brazilian red propolis improves cutaneous wound healing suppressing inflammation-associated transcription factor NFκB. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;86:162-71.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Hämäläinen M, Nieminen R, Asmawi MZ, Vuorela P, Vapaatalo H, Moilanen E. Effects of flavonoids on prostaglandin E2 production and on COX-2 and mPGES-1 expressions in activated macrophages. Planta Med 2011;77:1504-11.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: Therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med 2012;18:1028-40.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Reinke JM, Sorg H. Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res 2012;49:35-43.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Menna-Barreto RF, Salomão K, Dantas AP, Santa-Rita RM, Soares MJ, Barbosa HS, et al. Different cell death pathways induced by drugs in Trypanosoma cruzi: An ultrastructural study. Micron 2009;40:157-68.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Takaisi-Kikuni NB, Schilcher H. Electron microscopic and microcalorimetric investigations of the possible mechanism of the antibacterial action of a defined propolis provenance. Planta Med 1994;60:222-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
To WS, Midwood KS. Plasma and cellular fibronectin: Distinct and independent functions during tissue repair. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2011;4:21.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lotfy M, Badra G, Burham W, Alenzi FQ. Combined use of honey, bee propolis and myrrh in healing a deep, infected wound in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Br J Biomed Sci 2006;63:171-3.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Olczyk P, Wisowski G, Komosinska-Vassev K, Stojko J, Klimek K, Olczyk M, et al. Propolis modifies collagen types I and III accumulation in the matrix of burnt tissue. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013;2013:423809.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Iyyam Pillai S, Palsamy P, Subramanian S, Kandaswamy M. Wound healing properties of Indian propolis studied on excision wound-induced rats. Pharm Biol 2010;48:1198-206.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
de Almeida EB, Cordeiro Cardoso J, Karla de Lima A, de Oliveira NL, de Pontes-Filho NT, Oliveira Lima S, et al. The incorporation of Brazilian propolis into collagen-based dressing films improves dermal burn healing. J Ethnopharmacol 2013;147:419-25.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Hozzein WN, Badr G, Al Ghamdi AA, Sayed A, Al-Waili NS, Garraud O. Topical application of propolis enhances cutaneous wound healing by promoting TGF-beta/Smad-mediated collagen production in a streptozotocin-induced type I diabetic mouse model. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;37:940-54.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lachenmeier DW. Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity. J Occup Med Toxicol 2008;3:26.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Galeotti F, Maccari F, Fachini A, Volpi N. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of propolis prepared in different forms and in different solvents useful for finished products. Foods 2018;7:41.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Andritoiu CV, Lungu C, Danu M, Ivanescu B, Andriescu CE, Vlase L, et al. Evaluation of the healing effect of ointments based on bee products on cutaneous lesions in wistar rats. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021;14:1146.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Dumitru CD, Neacsu IA, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E. Bee-derived products: Chemical composition and applications in skin tissue engineering. Pharmaceutics 2022;14:750.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Bankova V, Castro SL, Marcucci MC. Propolis: Recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 2000;31:3-15.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Nayak S, Nalabothu P, Sandiford S, Bhogadi V, Adogwa A. Evaluation of wound healing activity of Allamanda cathartica. L. and Laurus nobilis. L. Extracts on rats. BMC Complement Altern Med 2006;6:12.  Back to cited text no. 40
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed436    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal